Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!
Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
Open Community
Post to this Blog
« November 2007 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
You are not logged in. Log in
Love and Madness
Wednesday, 28 November 2007
Hitting The Moon With A Multi-Million Dollar Rock

I’ve always had an interest in space travel.  I’m just fascinated by the history and technology.  Space travel technology is just all so primitive, really.  The shuttles, satellites and suits all seem so fragile.  It makes me think of some kind or alternate, Flash Gordon like universe of undersea adventure.  Whenever I see a space suit it makes me think of those old deep sea diving suits.  The huge, bulky ones with the rusty metal dome helmets complete with that swinging gate in the front.

 

I particularly like the early years, the U.S.S.R. stuff (No, I’m not a commie red.  I’m as blue-blooded as the next American).  It seems an absolute miracle to me that we ever made it to the moon first.  Since the beginning of the space race it was the Soviets all over the place, ahead of us at every turn.

 

The U.S.S.R.’s Lunar Program was the one that was kicking our capitalist asses.  But of the infamous Lunar satellites (Which include many ‘firsts’ like: first lunar flyby (Luna 1), first photographs from the dark side of the moon (Luna 3) and first deployment of a lunar rover and analysis of lunar soil (Luna 17)) it’s Luna 2 that I find most fascinating.

 

Fascinating probably isn’t that right word, though.  Let’s try…  “Humorous”.  I say that because Luna 2 was the first man made artifact to strike the moon.  The emphasis being “strike”.  It struck the moon.  That was its purpose.  It didn’t quietly drop down onto the surface like a downy feather, full of sunshine rainbows (the first “successful” soft landing on the lunar surface didn’t come about until Luna 13.  That’s 11 Luna’s later) It literally struck it.  The goal of Luna 2 was simply to hit the moon.  “We know it’s there… We flew by it…  Let’s see if we can hit it!".  I just love the idea that for thousands of years there's complete silence on the lunar surface and then all of a sudden...  BAM!  And this pointed, metal ball slams into it.

 

It’s a goal that goes back to cave man days when Neanderthals used to throw rocks at the moon in a vain attempt to bring it down (So they could possess its demonic powers, of course).  And you can’t tell me that the people who were alive during the short time that the moon was believed to be made of cheese didn’t occasionally desire to strike it down and fest on the sweet reward.  So now, thousands of years later, we’ve finally reached our goal…  We’ve finally accomplished hitting the moon with a multi-million dollar rock.

 

Love and Madness,

D. Bradford

 

p.s. - I forgot to mention...  It was on Sept. 14, 1959 that Luna 2 hit the moon.  I know you were dying to know!


Posted by Inrideo at 12:30 PM PST
Updated: Wednesday, 28 November 2007 12:47 PM PST
Post Comment | View Comments (1) | Permalink | Share This Post
Monday, 26 November 2007
Geocaching... Is It Real? I'm Afraid So...

For those who don’t know what I’m taking about… Let me enlighten you.  Geocaching is a delightful little pass time that, as Craig Dilger of the Daily Herald said in his article “New-age Treasure Hunts”, “Combines technology with the outdoors” (Dilger).  Specifically, the participant looks up locations of “Geocaches” on the internet, and then loads the latitude and longitude into a GPS device.  Then, they go to the site and dig up some sort of box or bag and admire the…  “Treasures” inside, hidden by another “Geocacher” as they’re apparently called.  Hard to believe, But it’s actually a big hobby.  Yeah…  People do it.

 

Not only that…  They enjoy it too!  In the article from the Daily Herald, Dilger tells us about a young couple (Jacob and Helen Barlow) who met…  While Geocaching.  It was a Geocaching blind date, no less.  How lovely!  The two hit it off, of course (No huge nerd can resist another huge nerd) and met up several times after that (to go Geocaching, obviously).  Once, even, at an actual, honest Geocaching event.  Now they’re married and they go out Geocaching every day, according to the article.  Between the two of them they’ve found over 4,400 Geocaches. “My favorite part about Geocaching is that it is a hobby that we share together” said Mr. Barlow.  Whether he was referring to his newly wedded wife or the entire human race I can’t say for sure.

 

Lovely…  Just lovely.  If that isn’t alarming enough…  Apparently there are 487,460 active caches worldwide, 37,749 Geocachers registered on the web and 9,688 Geocaches hidden in Utah alone.  It makes you wonder what exactly we’re all doing with our short time here on this little planet.

 

Love and Madness,

D. Bradford

 

p.s. – Be sure to visit www.geocaching.com...  Loser.


Posted by Inrideo at 1:16 PM PST
Post Comment | View Comments (1) | Permalink | Share This Post
Sunday, 25 November 2007
Things That Really Bother Me, Part One

People who drive around in old police cars.  I don’t know where they’re getting them or why, but they’re annoying.  I always see them driving behind me in the rear view mirror and think that some cop is tailing me.  So I slow down a bit…  I make sure I’m doing everything just right…  Then they get upset that I’m going so slowly and they pull around me.  That’s when I see that they’re not cops at all.  Dammit!  Why?

It’s particularly irritating when they still have that little spot light attached to the side there.  And when they have a bike rack or something on top.  They look exactly like a police car then.  Especially at night or in the dark of the morning, when I’m driving to work.

Where do they get these cars anyways?  Police auctions?  I’ve heard of police auctions but I’ve never known anyone to actually go to one.  There must be some kind of strange counter-culture of people who scavange police auctions.  "You wouldn't believe the deals you can get! I mean...  Just look at this car!  I had get rid of the CB radio, the shotgun holder and clean some blood off the seats...  But hey! I got it at a police auction!  Retail is for suckers!"  I wonder at the kind of mentality that thinks that driving around in an old cop car or repossessed crack van is "the thing to do."

Love and Madness,
D. Bradford


Posted by Inrideo at 11:00 AM PST
Post Comment | View Comments (1) | Permalink | Share This Post
Sunday, 18 November 2007
O Bill Gates... What Have You Done?
Damn you, Peter Jackson!  Don’t touch my Halo!  I knew, or at least thought I knew, that Peter Jackson would be directing a movie based on the all powerful video game Halo…  But Mr. Jackson’s idea seems to have changed.  Now, apparently, he wants to make what can only be described as an “interactive movie/video game”.  Wait just a minute…  The scruffy bastard thinks he can make video games now?  And not just any video games…  But Halo…  The video game.

Because Microsoft owns all the rights to Halo (They previously owned Bungie Studios, Halo’s developers, until Oct. 1, 2007 when Bungie became a privately held company.  Bungie will continue, apparently, to make games for Microsoft consoles but will no longer be making any games in the Halo universe.) I guess they felt that they could do anything they pleased with it.  They’ve already announced the development of Halo Wars (by Ensemble Studios), which is a war strategy based game similar to Starcraft.  But now this strange non-video game comes along, calling it’s self Halo: Chronicles.

Yeah, it seems that Jackson has created something called Wingnut Interactive and plans on making video games in addition to his epic films (including as 1989’s Meet The Feebles).  And not just one.  Halo: Chronicles is supposed to be a whole other trilogy of games, separate from the original Halos.   According to the article in XBOX 360 World, Peter Jackson himself didn’t even know exactly what the game would entail.  He described it as “not a game, not a film, but a filmic game experience!” and both Jackson and Microsoft executive Peter Moore unanimously described it as “an interactive entertainment.”  Which one could argue is exactly what a video game is in the first place.

This seems to me like too many hands in the cookie jar.  Halo has become more successful than anyone imagined (Halo: Combat Evolved was the first game on the XBOX and the game that put that system on the map.  Halo 3 made over $170 million after being released.  Shattering the previous record held by Halo 2, actually).  These people better know what they’re doing.  I love the Chief too much to see him molested like this.  I hope that, years from now, I won’t be on my knees on a lonely stretch of beach somewhere with my hands reaching up, beckoning the sky (think Willem Defoe in Platoon) and screaming: “O Bill Gates…  What have you done?”

Love and Madness,
D. Bradford

p.s. – I once saw a picture that sent shivers up my spine:  It was Bill Gates wearing a jacket with the UNSC (Who are essentially the Marines of the Halo universe) logo on it.  I could just see the dollar signs in his eyes.

Posted by Inrideo at 12:50 PM PST
Updated: Sunday, 25 November 2007 11:03 AM PST
Post Comment | View Comments (1) | Permalink | Share This Post
Monday, 12 November 2007
The Ass Kissing Kids

Does anyone remember when you were young and every strange looking and bizarre food item frightened you into paralysis? A paralysis from which you were immovable?  No matter many tools of convincing the enemy (parents) tried to employ against you…  It just wouldn’t take. When I say “strange looking and bizarre” I’m talking about things like mushrooms, olives, peppers, onions, various green things, etc…  The types of items children are automatically repulsed by.

 

“Try the broccoli…  It’s good for you!”

 

“Get thee back, woman!”

 

I’d say that everyone went through this phrase for the better part of their youth. But most eventually grew out of it.  In the transition from childhood to adulthood it is common that one develops a keener sense of taste for the more exotic ingredients (For the most part) and prejudices held previous are forgotten.

 

But that’s not what I wanted to talk about.  What I’m thinking of are the ass kissing kids.  The one’s who were supposedly right up there with the adults with their overly developed palettes.  Do you know what I’m talking about?  The kids who, when you dismissed or at the very least scowled at your unappetizing food, they gave you the same lecture that your parents did!

 

“Have you even tried it before?  If you’d try it, you’d like it!”

 

“I’ve tried it…  I don’t like it.”

 

“Oh…  Well…  You just don’t know about flavor.”

 

These kids had been forced by their loved ones to try the food over and over again and had finally decided to feign delight in favor of constant culinary oppression.  And now they were taking out all their hate and frustration on you.  I have a feeling that those kids are politicians now.

 

Love and Madness,

D. Bradford

 

p.s. – I still don’t like any of the foods I listed above…  Except broccoli.


Posted by Inrideo at 7:09 PM PST
Post Comment | View Comments (2) | Permalink | Share This Post
Wednesday, 7 November 2007
Food And Freedom Were Never Meant To Be One

Food and freedom were never meant to be one.  This has never been more evident than in the phenomenon that is Subway.  Subway’s sandwich making and service system is beyond my comprehension.  I have no idea how to react to it.  It makes absolutely no sense to me.  I don’t know what the purpose is.

 

Firstly, okay…  It’s nice to be able to customize your sandwich ingredients.  Oh boy, yeah!  That’s great, yah know…  But what I’d like to do, really, is order the sandwich that is up on the board.  Would that be so difficult?  I’d like to be able to say:  “I’ll have the ‘Chicken Ranch Club,’ please.”  And then get exactly that.  But I can’t.  It’s impossible.  As soon as I ask for a particular sandwich I’m bombarded with a serious of grueling inquiries regarding the ingredients of the sandwich.  I don’t know what goes in the ‘Chicken Ranch Club’!  Just make it already!

 

“What kind of meat do you want?”

 

“Oh…  Well, it’s the ‘Chicken Ranch Club’ so…”

 

“So you want chicken?”

 

“Yeah, yeah…  I want the chicken.”

 

“What kind of sauce do you want?”

 

“Are you kidding me?  Ranch…  I want ranch.”

 

“Okay, now…  What kind of veggies?”

 

“What?  Are you trying to say 'vegetables'?”

 

I just don’t get it.  If you’re going allow changes, substitutions and omissions of every single part of the sandwich then why even have specific sandwiches at all?  Why have the “Turkey Breast & Ham.”  What kinds of questions are you going to be asked if you order the “Oven Roasted Chicken Breast” (“Do you want the chicken breast to be oven roasted?”) or the “Sweet Onion Chicken Teriyaki” (“Do you want teriyaki on that?”)  It’s like you have to just create your own sandwich from scratch.  That’d be fine if that was the hitch but it’s not.

 

Secondly…  I don’t really have a second point to complain about.  Oh, wait!  Isn’t Subway supposedly some big health-conscious place?  Why then, by the time you’re through the dreaded gauntlet, are you offered soda and a cookie?  It just doesn’t make sense!

 

Love and Madness,

D. Bradford

 

p.s. – I was once pressured into choosing a bunch of ingredients I didn’t want because they were training a new employee; However, I did get a free cookie out of it.


Posted by Inrideo at 11:54 AM PST
Post Comment | View Comments (2) | Permalink | Share This Post
Saturday, 3 November 2007
A Very Real Shroud Of Darkness And Evil
Last night my lover and I (Lets call him…  Jareth) went riding about town with the intent of purchasing various items of entertainment.  But entertainment wasn’t at all what we got.  We soon discovered that a very real shroud of darkness and evil had descended on the peoples of the Salt Lake valley.

Our first clue occurred has we were leaving the parking lot of our first stop, Barnes & Noble.  While we pulled out of the parking spot we noticed a small girl being dragged along by her parent.  But that’s not the alarming part.  The alarming part was the twisted look of demonic possession that inhabited her face.  I’ve never seen anything so full of pure, unadulterated malice…  And it was directed straight at us!  Shortly thereafter we were nearly struck by a car driving on the wrong side of the road.  A surly, disheveled, shell of a woman was driving, accompanied by her enormous monster of a son, who reclined in the passenger seat, nestled against a comfy pillow.  She angrily backed her car out of our way, nearly hitting another vehicle in the process.

And the night didn’t end there, sir.  Our next stop was Circuit City, where we were met by a gaggle of lumbering, zombie drunks who would, as Jareth pointed out, stop at nothing to “buy batteries.”  They choked the parking lot full and were nearly impossible to maneuver around.  On the way into the store we encountered a couple who bickered nastily about their hard drive.  “I don’t care about the hard drive!  Where did we get THIS?!” the man said, while violently shaking a jump drive in his wife’s face.

Obviously finding nothing of what were searching for, we opted to head to the always trustworthy FYE.  It was on the way there that we saw it.  This dark, black cloud of death hung menacingly over the downtown area of Salt Lake…  And it was growing larger.  I noted that there was a jet liner headed for the cloud.  “Looks like someone’s trying to be a hero,” I said “That’s never a good thing.”  Moments later, Jareth noted that the plane was gone.  “Yeah,” I said, “It was consumed by the darkness.”  He fell into mad panic, ranting about the evil that was surrounding us.  I could see he was being over come by the fear.  But it was too late…  I was already soaked with the blackness of it.  It was only a matter of time before the darkness consumed him as well…

Love and Madness,
D. Bradford

p.s. – The Burger King employee who took my money, while texting, sounded like he wanted to kill himself.  Coincidence?

Posted by Inrideo at 11:53 AM PDT
Updated: Wednesday, 7 November 2007 12:04 PM PST
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Wednesday, 31 October 2007
Bloody Crap That Flings At You From All Directions

Halloween always brings out the horror movie fans.  They emerge from the shadow and grab at you with their bony, white fingers demanding that you watch their beloved horror flicks.  All my life I’ve had beat them off with a stick or cross.  But every year they keep coming back for more.  “You gotta do it…  It’s Halloween!”, “Are you a sissy boy?” or “Hey, Ugly…  I don’t like your face!” (I don’t know what that guy’s problem was.) It’s like they don’t understand that someone could actually not enjoy watching crap for 90 minutes or so.  And not just crap…  But bloody crap that flings at you from all directions!

 

I’ve never been a horror movie fan (As I’m sure you’ve gathered.)  I don’t think I ever will be.  I just don’t understand them, I guess.  When I watch a movie I want to sit back, relax and take it all in.  You can’t do that with a horror movie.  With them it’s full-on, non-stop sensory bombardment!  No breaks!  I can’t do that!  It’s like a frickin’ work out (A subject I’m even less enthused about.)  But…  Considering its Halloween…  I figure I’d better speak up on the issue (‘Cause so many people look to me for guidance in all matters.)

 

One group of horror films that I’ve always found fascinating (Though never watched) is the meeting up of classic monsters.  You know what I’m talking about?  When one monster would “meet” another monster for whatever purpose.  Movies like Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man or Abbott And Costello Meet Frankenstein.  I wonder…  How do they meet exactly?  Do they just bump into each other while shopping at the Thrifty Mart or Shopko?  And if so do they chat each other up about old times or does mayhem ensue?

 

There are also two films where Frankenstein, the Wolf Man, Dracula and a Mad Scientist just sort of get together and…  Hang out.  First at Frankenstein’s place (Frankenstein the monster…  Not to be confused with that Victor Frankenstein, the scientist who stole his name) in House Of Frankenstein and then Dracula’s in House Of Dracula.  I don’t know why they never went to the Wolf Man’s house.  Although I can assume it has something to do with smell.  And I think that Frankenstein and the Mad Scientist live together (You know how that goes!  Wink, wink!)  It took 17 years for Barry Pickett’s novelty song Monster Mash to come out after that (Sidenote: Apparently there was a movie based on that song called Monster Mash: The Movie produced in 1995 and starring Barry Pickett himself.  He was an aspiring actor. Sad... )

 

So in the end…  I guess what I’m trying to say is STAY BACK.  Keep your damn horror films to yourselves!  Of course one could argue that every movie I've discussed here are really more campy comedies than true horror.  But if you've thought that or anything close to it you're probably a horror movie asshole.

 

Love and Madness,

D. Bradford

 

p.s. - It’s interesting to note that after they made Abbott And Costello Meet Frankenstein they made another one where they didn’t even bother to come up with a monster for Boris Karloff to play called Abbott And Costello Meet The Killer Boris Karloff. Whatever brings the consumers- er, I mean…  People in, right?


Posted by Inrideo at 1:10 PM PDT
Updated: Thursday, 1 November 2007 6:08 PM PDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Monday, 29 October 2007
The Pope Of Pop

I found a little children’s book in the basement of my house that was all about influential Americans.  It was titled “101 People Who Changed America” or some nonsense to that affect.  I flipped through, seeing people like George Washington and Mark Twain.  Okay…  Sure.  But then I saw Andy Warhol.  Really?  Warhol?  Changing America?  Maybe I just don’t know enough about Mr. Warhol to make a serious judgment.  I do know a little (He was played by David Bowie in the Julian Schnabel film Basquait about artist Jean-Michel Basquait.  A great film if you’re a Jeffrey Wright fan.)

 

Well, turns out (According to the highly reliable Wikipedia) that Andy (whose real name is Andrew Warhola – Come on now, people…  If you’re gonna change your names get creative.  At least 2 letters, minimum.  Woody Allen’s real name is Allen Stewart Königsberg.) was the leader of the 1960’s New York art movement known as “Pop Art”, which is basically turning popular logos, icons or people of the day into art.  Not only was he the leader of the movement, but fellow artist (Such as the aptly named Billy Apple and Jasper Johns (Whose, by the way, famous piece is just a print of the American flag – Jasper also appeared on an episode of The Simpsons, where he was featured stealing various things, including Homer’s art, throughout the episode.) saw fit to refer to him as the “Pope of Pop”.

He is famous for his print work.  Such as multiple portraits of Marilyn Monroe, A plethora of Campbell’s brand soup cans as well as many self-portraits.  He also did some crazy avant-garde gay films (Don’t ask how I know that. One of his films, Vinyl, is actually an adaptation of Anthony Burgess’ novel A Clockwork Orange) and was considered to have made himself into somewhat of a pop icon (He was constantly seen wearing a black cashmere suit, a paisley tie, a platinum wig, and sunglasses.) 

He was also shot once, by Valerie Solanas.  She was the founder of a crazy feminist movement called S.C.U.M. (I don’t know what that stands for but I do know they were against men, particularly Warhol, and authored something called the S.C.U.M. manifesto) and shot Warhol (Along with fellow artist Mario Amaya) in his studio because he had “misplaced her screenplay.”  But really because he was a man who, and I quote: “had too much control over my life” (Solanas).  They made a movie about that too.  I Shot Andy Warhol is it's name.  I fell asleep half way through.

That’s all great, grand and wonderful but I just don’t see how it makes him one of the “101 People Who Changed America”.  If anything he simply held up a mirror and let America sort of check it’s self out.  Freshen up; comb its hair a little.  That sort of thing.  I don’t know…  I’ve never really been a big “art” fan.

 

 

Love and Madness,

D. Bradford


Posted by Inrideo at 1:03 PM PDT
Updated: Monday, 29 October 2007 2:51 PM PDT
Post Comment | View Comments (1) | Permalink | Share This Post
Friday, 26 October 2007
Moot Is Moot
My fascination and struggle with the word “moot” has led me to wild and strange places.  Well, I guess that’s an exaggeration.  Let’s just say that the journey was interesting enough to be committed to a page of the Internet (Possibly a moot point in and of it’s self).

Most people, including myself, use the word “moot” as an adjective to describe something as being unimportant or more commonly irrelevant.  But this is actually only the second definition (according to the highly reliable Microsoft Word Dictionary) and is designated “informal.”  The first definition is “open to argument.”  Which seems pretty close…  But not quite the meaning I’ve always known “moot” to have.

But that is only the surface!  There’s a whole plethora of alternate definitions for “moot” including both noun and verb versions.  They all seem to be centered around some kind of legal gathering.  The first verbal definition is: “To offer an idea for consideration or a topic for discussion” (Which the dictionary notes is “Usually Passive.”  Whatever that means).  The second:  “To take part in a debate, especially one organized as an academic exercise, for example, among law students” (The dictionary here described this definition as “Formal.”  How are they deciding these things?)

I challenge anyone to find a way to fit a verbal version of “moot” into a conversation without getting some look.  I can just see it now:  “If it’s okay, Bill, I’d like to moot the topic of global warming for discussion” or “Hey, fellas, let’s moot it up!”

The occurrence of “moot” as a noun is equally as interesting.  The first being: “An academic discussion in which people such as law students argue hypothetically or plead a hypothetical case” (Like a legal dry run, sure).  The last and my personal favorite: “In Anglo-Saxon England, a formal gathering for settling legal and administrative matters.”

I’m not quite sure how the meaning of this beloved word ever turn away from it’s legal origins but I’m just too lazy to delve into the matter any further.

Love and Madness,
D. Bradford

p.s.- There’s also a term “Moot Court” which is “A court in which imaginary legal cases are conducted and tried by law students as part of their training.”  Sounds like a grand ole time to me!


Posted by Inrideo at 4:58 PM PDT
Post Comment | View Comments (1) | Permalink | Share This Post

Newer | Latest | Older